Wp(C)/6944/2017 Of Kizhakkedathu Enterprises v. Agricultural Income Tax
High Court
02 Mar 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/6944/2017 Of Kizhakkedathu Enterprises v. Agricultural Income Tax
Date of order
02 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/6944/2017 Of Kizhakkedathu Enterprises v. Agricultural Income Tax, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2017/11TH PHALGUNA, 1938
WP(C).No. 6944 of 2017 (P)
---------------------------
PETITIONER(S):-------------
KIZHAKKEDATHU ENTERPRISES PAZHAVANGADY, RANNI, (REPRESENTED BY MG. PARTNER, JOMON PHILIP). BY ADVS.SRI.K.N.SREEKUMARAN SMT.V.P.SEENA DEVI
RESPONDENT(S):--------------
1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX & COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, RANNI, PATHANAMTHITTA(DT). 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)-II COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOLLAM. 3. KVAT TRIBUNAL, ADDL.BENCH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. (REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT SECRETARY). 4. INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, PATHANAMTHITTA.
R1-4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. V.K. SHAMSUDDIN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-03-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS-----------------------P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER BEARING NO.32030966575 DATED 10.6.2013 FOR 2010-11 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENTP2 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER BEARING NO.32030966575 DATED 30.9.2015 FOR 2013-14 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENTP3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPELLATE ORDER BEARING NO.KVATA(PTA) 109/13 DATED 3.10.2017 FOR THE YEAR 2010-11 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENTP4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPELLATE ORDER BEARING NO.KVATA(PTA) 303/15 DATED 3.10.2017 FOR THE YEAR 2013-14 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENTP5 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND DRAFT DATED 29.11.2013 FOR RS.2,69,871/- PRODUCED BY THE PETITIONERP6 TRUE COPY OF THE CHALLAN DATED 21.5.2015 FOR RS.3,80,000/- PRODUCED BY THE PETITIONERP7 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR 2010-11 FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 16.2.2017P7(A) TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED IN EXT.P7 APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 16.2.2017P7(B) TRUE COPY OF THE EARLY HEARING PETITION FILED IN EXT.P7 APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 16.02.2017P8 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR 2013-14 FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 16.2.2017P8(A) TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED IN EXT.P8 APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 16.2.2017P8(B) TRUE COPY OF THE EARLY HEARING PETITION FILED IN EXT.P8 APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 16.02.2017RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS-----------------------
NIL
TRUE COPY
P.S. TO JUDGE
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J
- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -W.P(C) No. 6944 of 2017 P- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 02[nd] day of March, 2017
Exts.P1 and P2 are the assessment orders passed
against the petitioner for the years 2010-11 and 2013-14.Against these orders, petitioner filed Exts.P7 and P8 appeals,which is accompanied by Exts.P7(a) and P8(a) stay petitionsbefore the 3[rd] respondent. The appeal and the stay petitions arepending before the 3[rd] respondent. In the meanwhile, it isalleged, coercive proceedings have been threatened. It is inthis context, the writ petition has been filed.
2. In the above circumstances, it is directed that the
appellate authority, the 3[rd ] respondent herein, shall dispose of
Exts.P7(a) and P8(a) stay applications within a period of twomonths from today and the coercive proceedings be stayed
WPC.No.6944/2017
until such orders are passed; which order shall determine the
matter thereafter.
3. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment
before the 3[rd] respondent for compliance.
Writ petition disposed of.
jma
Sd/-
(K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE)//true copy//
P.A to Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.