Wp(C)/7042/2020 Of Kavalangad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
09 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/7042/2020 Of Kavalangad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
09 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/7042/2020 Of Kavalangad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to thesecond respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
MONDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 19TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.7042 OF 2020(E)
PETITIONER/S:
KAVALANGAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.1348,KAVALANGAD, NELLIMATTOM P.O., ERNAKULAM-686693, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.JOJOSMT.SWATHY S.
RESPONDENT/S:
1INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD-2, ALUVA P.O., ALUVA-683101.
2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-2,OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN-682018.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON09.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a
direction to dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before thesecond respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)against the assessment order Ext.P1.
2.
Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,
the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to thesecond respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment withoutinsisting on payment of 20% of the tax demanded, as percircular of 2017. Till such time a decision is taken on theappeal, recovery proceedings pursuant to the assessmentorder shall be kept in abeyance.
sab
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY 2017-18 DATED 29/12/2019 ISSUEDBY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S. 156 DATED 29/12/2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2017-18 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 27/01/2020.
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF DEMAND DATED 24/02/2020 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.