Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/7056/2007 Of Calicut Islamic Cultu...

Wp(C)/7056/2007 Of Calicut Islamic Cultural Society v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 13 Mar 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/7056/2007 Of Calicut Islamic Cultural Society v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
13 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/7056/2007 Of Calicut Islamic Cultural Society v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 13TH MARCH 2007 / 22ND PHALGUNA 1928 WP(C).No. 7056 of 2007(M) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ---------------- CALICUT ISLAMIC CULTURAL SOCIETY, KOLATHARA P.O., KOZHIKODE-673 655 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY M.MOHAMED. BY ADV. DR.K.B.MUHAMED KUTTY (SR.) SRI.K.M.FIROZ RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2(1), KOZHIKODE. 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-1, CALICUT-1. 3. THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MUHAMMED RAFIQ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------------ WP(C)NO.7056 OF 2007-M ------------------------------------------ Judgment The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P1 assessment order passed by the 1[st]respondent. The said order was challenged by it before the 2[nd] respondent inappeal. The said appeal was dismissed by Ext.P2 order. Against Ext.P2, thepetitioner filed Ext.P3 appeal along with Ext.P4 stay petition before the 3[rd]respondent. Thereafter, this Writ Petition is filed, praying for a direction to thethird respondent to dispose of Ext.P3 appeal expeditiously. 2. I heard the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents also. The WritPetition is disposed of directing the third respondent to consider and pass orderson Ext.P4 stay petition in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, at anyrate, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment.Further recovery pursuant to Exts.P1 and P2 will be kept in abeyance for a periodof one month from today. 13.03.2007 K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR,JUDGE sta
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan