Wp(C)/7108/2020 Of The Kizhuvilam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
09 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/7108/2020 Of The Kizhuvilam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
09 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/7108/2020 Of The Kizhuvilam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2[nd]respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
MONDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 19TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.7108 OF 2020(K)
PETITIONER:
THE KIZHUVILAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.2405,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-IN-CHARGE, MUDAPURAM P.O., CHIRAYINKEEZH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695304.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.R.HARIKUMARSRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-2(5), OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695003.WARD-2(5), OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695003.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003.AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003.
3THE GENERAL MANAGER,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, HEAD OFFICE, EAST FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001.THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, HEAD OFFICE, EAST FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001.
SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON09.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a directionto dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the 2[nd]respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) againstthe assessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2[nd]respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting onpayment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of2017. Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal,recovery proceedings pursuant to the assessment order shallbe kept in abeyance.
nak
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2017-2018 DATED 20.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DATED 20.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE ONLINE APPEAL DATED 28.12.2019, FILED AGAINST EXT.P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER, BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN EXT.P3 APPEAL DATED18.01.2020.
EXHIBIT P5
A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.07.2019 IN W.A.NO.1639 OF 2019.
EXHIBIT P6
A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 17.02.2020 IN WP(C)NO.4433 OF 2020.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.