Wp(C)/7195/2012 Of M/S. Prs Hospital v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax
High Court
29 Mar 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/7195/2012 Of M/S. Prs Hospital v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
29 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
2008-2009, 2009-2010
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/7195/2012 Of M/S. Prs Hospital v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Decision: Writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MARCH 2012/9TH CHAITHRA 1934
WP(C).No. 7195 of 2012 (Y)
---------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-------------------
1. M/S. PRS HOSPITAL,
T.C.21/44, KARAMANA, KILLIPPALAM
TRIVANDRUM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER
R.MURUGAN
S/O.P.RATNASWAMY, RESIDING AT RAJCOT, THYCAUD TRIVANDRUM-695 003.
BY ADVS.SRI.R.S.KALKURA
SRI.M.S.KALESH SMT.A.V.PRIYA SRI.HARISH GOPINATH SRI.V.VINAY MENON
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------------
1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1 (2), TRIVANDRUM - 695 003. CIRCLE - 1 (2), TRIVANDRUM - 695 003.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
(APPEALS-1) TRIVANDRUM-695 003.
3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TRIVANDRUM CIRCLE, TRIVANDRUM-695 003.
BY ADD. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
svs
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-03-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C). NO. 7195/2012
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
P1:COPY OF THE DEED OF PARTNERSHIP DATED 29/3/2010 ENTERED INTO BETWEEN R.MURUGAN AND OTHERS.INTO BETWEEN R.MURUGAN AND OTHERS.
P2:COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2007-2008 DATED DATED
P3:COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2008-2009 DATED DATED
P4:COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)VIZ.THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2007-2008.PETITIONER BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)VIZ.THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2007-2008.
P5:COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL IN RESPECT OF THE 2008-2009 (ASSESSMENT YEAR S2009-2010) SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.2008-2009 (ASSESSMENT YEAR S2009-2010) SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
P6:COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED 30/6/2011 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009.ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009.
P7:COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED 2/12/2011 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010.ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010.
P8:COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 31/10/2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX FORSTATY OF RECOVERY. PETITIONER BEFORE THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX FORSTATY OF RECOVERY.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A. TO JUDGE.
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
================W.P.(C) NO. 7195 OF 2012
===================
Dated this the 29[th] day of March, 2012
J U D G M E N T
Petitioner is an assessee under the Income Tax Act. Exts.P2and P3 are the orders of assessment passed against them for2008-09 and 2009-10 assessment years. Against the assessmentorders, petitioner filed Exts.P4 and P5 appeals which are pendingconsideration of the 2[nd] respondent. Along with the assessmentorders, they were issued Exts.P6 and P7 demand notices. Afterthe appeals were filed, petitioner filed Ext.P8 application beforethe 3[rd] respondent seeking stay of recovery of the amounts dueunder Exts.P2 and P3 and according to the learned counsel for thepetitioner, a conditional order was passed requiring the petitionerto pay `5,00,000 each from December, 2011. It is stated that onthat basis, so far `20,00,000 has been paid.
2.Now apprehending coercive action based on Exts.P6and P7, this writ petition has been filed seeking an expeditiousdisposal of the appeals keeping the recovery proceedings inabeyance.
3.I heard the learned standing counsel appearing for the
respondents who points out that about `1.14 crores is the liabilityof the petitioner under Exts.P2 and P3.
2.Now apprehending coercive action based on Exts.P6and P7, this writ petition has been filed seeking an expeditiousdisposal of the appeals keeping the recovery proceedings inabeyance.
3.I heard the learned standing counsel appearing for the
respondents who points out that about `1.14 crores is the liabilityof the petitioner under Exts.P2 and P3.
4.Admittedly, Exts.P4 and P5 appeals filed by thepetitioner are pending consideration of the 2[nd] respondent.Therefore, it is incumbent on the part of the 2[nd] respondent toconsider the same with notice to the petitioner and asexpeditiously as possible.
5.In the meantime, subject to the petitioner remitting anamount of `25,00,000, recovery of balance tax due under Exts.P2and P3 will stand stayed. Payment shall be made before15/4/2012.
Writ petition is disposed of as above.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.