Wp(C)/7243/2020 Of Enanalloor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
10 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/7243/2020 Of Enanalloor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
10 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
2013-14, 2014-15
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/7243/2020 Of Enanalloor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 20TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.7243 OF 2020(E)
PETITIONERS:
ENANALLOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDNO.1447, AYAVANA P O, ENANALLOOR, MUVATTUPUZHA, PIN-686668, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.JOJOSRI.MATHEWS JOSEPH
RESPONDENTS:
1INCOME TAX OFFICER,NON CORPORATE, WARD 1, TEMPLE ROAD, THODUPUZHA P O, PIN-685584
2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-2,OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL REVENUE TOWER, KOCHI-682018.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON10.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking adirection to dispose of Exts.P3, P6 and P9 appealspreferred before the second respondent/Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals) against the assessment ordersExts.P1, P4 and P7.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to thesecond respondent to take a decision on Exts.P3, P6 andP9 appeals in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period ofthree months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment without insisting on payment of 20% of the taxdemanded, as per circular of 2017. Till such time adecision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment orders shall be kept inabeyance.
vv
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
WP(C).No.7243 OF 2020
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY 2013-14 DATED 18.03.2016 BY THE1ST RESPONDENT.FOR AY 2013-14 DATED 18.03.2016 BY THE1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S.156 DATED 18.03.2016 ISSUED BY THEFIRST RESPONDENT.U/S.156 DATED 18.03.2016 ISSUED BY THEFIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2013-14 BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 13.04.2016.14 BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 13.04.2016.
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY 2014-15 DATED 19.12.2016 BY THE1ST RESPONDENT.FOR AY 2014-15 DATED 19.12.2016 BY THE1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5
A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S.156 DATED 19.12.2016 ISSUED BY THEFIRST RESPONDENT.U/S.156 DATED 19.12.2016 ISSUED BY THEFIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2014-15 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 20.01.2017.15 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 20.01.2017.
EXHIBIT P7
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY 2017-18 DATED 20.12.2019 ISSUEDBY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.FOR AY 2017-18 DATED 20.12.2019 ISSUEDBY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P8
A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S. 156 DATED 20.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.156 DATED 20.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P9A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2017-18 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 16.01.2020.18 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 16.01.2020.
EXHIBIT P10
A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED 03.03.2010 FOR 20% OF TAX FOR AY2013-14, 2014-15 AND 2017-18 ISSUED BYTHE 1ST RESPONDENT.DATED 03.03.2010 FOR 20% OF TAX FOR AY2013-14, 2014-15 AND 2017-18 ISSUED BYTHE 1ST RESPONDENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.