Wp(C)/7307/2022 Of Subramanyan Harikumar v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
07 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/7307/2022 Of Subramanyan Harikumar v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
07 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/7307/2022 Of Subramanyan Harikumar v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
MONDAY, THE 7 DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 16TH PHALGUNA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 7307 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
SUBRAMANYAN HARIKUMAR29/58-4, 42/509 MANIS, M.G ROAD, KARNAKI NAGAR, PALAKKAD KERALA 678 012BY ADVS.DIVYA RAVINDRANLINCY GLANCYRETHIN R.
RESPONDENTS:
1INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 1 AND TPS, PALAKKAD, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, INCOME TAX OFFICE, CHURCH ROAD, PALAKKAD 678 0142THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO. 401, 2ND FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL STADIUM, NEW DELHI 110 0033THE COMMISSIOENR OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTER (NFAC) INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, JAWARHARLAL STADIUM, NEW DELHI 110 003
OTHER PRESENT:
ADV. JOSE JOSEPH -S.C
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON07.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 7307 OF 2022
-:2:-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
-----------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No. 7307 of 2022
----------------------------------------
Dated this the 7[th] day of March, 2022JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment relating to
assessment year 2017-18, petitioner has preferred anappeal before the 3[rd]respondent, a copy of which isproduced as Ext.P3. A petition for stay of proceedingspursuant to the assessment order has also been filed asExt.P4. Petitioner apprehends coercive proceedings to beeffected even before the petition for stay is considered.Hence this writ petition.
2. Having considered the submissions of the counsel
for the petitioner as well as the respondents, I am of theopinion that this writ petition itself can be disposed of witha direction.
3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 3[rd]respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 stay
WP(C) NO. 7307 OF 2022
-:3:-
petition, within a period of three months from the date of
receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such a decision istaken, all coercive proceedings pursuant to Ext.P2 penaltyorder under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act 1961,shall be kept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
AJM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE
WP(C) NO. 7307 OF 2022
-:4:-
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 7307/2022
PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS :
Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 10-10-2019 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE PENALTY ORDER DATED 19-01-2022 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 16-02-2022 E-FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 13-02-2022, E-FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT’S EXHIBITS : NIL
AJM //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.