Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/7343/2020 Of Romy Rex v. Income Ta...

Wp(C)/7343/2020 Of Romy Rex v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 11 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/7343/2020 Of Romy Rex v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
11 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/7343/2020 Of Romy Rex v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 21ST PHALGUNA, 1941 WP(C).No.7343 OF 2020(P) PETITIONER/S: ROMY REXAGED 59 YEARSEXCEL KADAVIPARAMBIL, KUMBALANGI, ERNAKULAM-682 007. BY ADVS.SRI.A.KRISHNANSRI.R.UMASANKAR RESPONDENT/S: SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON11.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court, seeking a direction to the appellate authority to dispose of the appeal and interimapplication preferred against the assessment order issued by thesecond respondent - Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). 2.Learned Counsel for the income tax departmentsubmitted that appropriate decision on the application of staywould be taken by the authorities, if a time frame is fixed by thisCourt. 3.Though this Court ought not to have interfered, but inthe interest of justice, without expressing any opinion, this writpetition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondentto take a decision on Ext.P2(a) application for stay filed alongwith Ext.P2 appeal in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of threemonths from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such time, if any proceedings contemplated pursuant to Ext.P1assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. Jm/ Sd/ AMIT RAWALJUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 27.12.2019 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 29.1.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2 (A) TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 31.1.2020 FILED IN EXT P2 APPEAL
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan