Wp(C)/7360/2020 Of Thorachiyil Varkey Sabu v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
11 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/7360/2020 Of Thorachiyil Varkey Sabu v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
11 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/7360/2020 Of Thorachiyil Varkey Sabu v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 21ST PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.7360 OF 2020(T)
PETITIONER/S:
THORACHIYIL VARKEY SABUAGED 54 YEARSTHORACHIYIL, MULANTHURUTHY, ERNAKULAM-682 314
BY ADVS.SRI.A.KRISHNANSRI.R.UMASANKAR
RESPONDENT/S:
SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON11.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court, seeking a direction tothe appellate authority to dispose of the appeal and interimapplication preferred against the assessment order issued by thefirst respondent.
2.Though this Court ought not to have interfered, but inthe interest of justice, without expressing any opinion, this writpetition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondentto take a decision on Ext.P2(a) application for stay filed alongwith Ext.P2 appeal in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of threemonths from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Jm/
Sd/
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 30.12.2019 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 29.01.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P2A
TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 31.01.2020 FILE DIN EXT.P2 APPEAL
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.