Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/7454/2020 Of The Mayyanad Regional...

Wp(C)/7454/2020 Of The Mayyanad Regional Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)

High Court 11 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/7454/2020 Of The Mayyanad Regional Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
11 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/7454/2020 Of The Mayyanad Regional Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the thirdrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 21ST PHALGUNA, 1941 WP(C).No.7454 OF 2020(F) PETITIONER: THE MAYYANAD REGIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,MAYYANAD BANK BUILDING, MAYYANAD, KOLLAMN - 691 303, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADVS.SRI.V.JAYAPRADEEPSMT.ANN SUSAN GEORGESMT.O.A.NURIYASRI.D.S.LOKANATHANSRI.ALAN PRIYADARSHI DEV RESPONDENTS: 1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003. 2THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,KOLLAM - 691001. WARD NO.4, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, KARBALA JUNCTION, ADV.SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON11.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Dated this the 11th day of March 2020 Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a directionto dispose of Ext.P2 appeal and Ext.P3 interim applicationpreferred before the first respondent/Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals) against the assessment orders Ext.P1. 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the thirdrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting on paymentof 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017. Till suchtime a decision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment orders shall be kept in abeyance. SD/- AMIT RAWALJUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 THE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED28/11/2019 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 THE COPY OF THE APPEAL IN FORM NO.35 DATED 26/12/2019 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3 THE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 03/03/2020 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 THE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 28/11/2019 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5 THE COPY OF THE CHALLAN NO.00017 DATED13/02/2020.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan