Wp(C)/7454/2020 Of The Mayyanad Regional Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
11 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/7454/2020 Of The Mayyanad Regional Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
11 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/7454/2020 Of The Mayyanad Regional Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the thirdrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 21ST PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.7454 OF 2020(F)
PETITIONER:
THE MAYYANAD REGIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,MAYYANAD BANK BUILDING, MAYYANAD, KOLLAMN - 691 303, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.JAYAPRADEEPSMT.ANN SUSAN GEORGESMT.O.A.NURIYASRI.D.S.LOKANATHANSRI.ALAN PRIYADARSHI DEV
RESPONDENTS:
1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003.
2THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,KOLLAM - 691001.
WARD NO.4, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, KARBALA JUNCTION,
ADV.SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON11.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 11th day of March 2020
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a directionto dispose of Ext.P2 appeal and Ext.P3 interim applicationpreferred before the first respondent/Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals) against the assessment orders Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the thirdrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting on paymentof 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017. Till suchtime a decision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment orders shall be kept in abeyance.
SD/-
AMIT RAWALJUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
THE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED28/11/2019 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2
THE COPY OF THE APPEAL IN FORM NO.35 DATED 26/12/2019 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3
THE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 03/03/2020 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4
THE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 28/11/2019 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5
THE COPY OF THE CHALLAN NO.00017 DATED13/02/2020.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.