Wp(C)/7463/2020 Of Panavally Service Co -Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
11 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/7463/2020 Of Panavally Service Co -Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
11 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/7463/2020 Of Panavally Service Co -Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the thirdrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 21ST PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.7463 OF 2020(G)
PETITIONER:
PANAVALLY SERVICE CO -OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO 901POOCHAKKAL.P.O,CHERTHALA,ALAPPUZHA-688526, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADV. SRI.C.A.JOJO
RESPONDENTS:
1INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD -3,ALAPPUZHA.P.O,ALAPPUZHA-688011.2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS),OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOTTAYAM TOWN.P.O,PIN-686001.
ADV.SRI JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON11.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 11th day of March 2020
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction todispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the secondrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment orders Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the thirdrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting on paymentof 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017. Till suchtime a decision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment orders shall be kept in abeyance.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWALJUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FORAY 2017-18 DATED 28.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S 156 DATED 28.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2017-18 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 14.01.2020.
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF 20% DEMANDDATED 05.03.2020 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.