Wp(C)/7511/2020 Of The Vazhakulam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
11 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/7511/2020 Of The Vazhakulam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
11 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
2013-14, 2014-15
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/7511/2020 Of The Vazhakulam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 21ST PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.7511 OF 2020(L)
PETITIONER:
THE VAZHAKULAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO. 751,VAZHAKULAM.P.O, MUVATTUPUZHA, PIN-686670.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.JOJOSRI.MATHEWS JOSEPH
RESPONDENTS:
1INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD -3 AND ALUVA RANGE,TEMPLE ROAD, THODUPUZHA.P.O, PIN-685584.
2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-2,OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL REVENUE TOWER,KOCHI-682018.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON11.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking adirection to dispose of Exts.P3, P6 and P9 appealspreferred before the second respondent/Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals) against the assessment ordersExts.P1, P4 and P7.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to thesecond respondent to take a decision on Exts.P3, P6 andP9 appeals in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period ofthree months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment without insisting on payment of 20% of the taxdemanded, as per circular of 2017. Till such time adecision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment orders shall be kept inabeyance.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
WP(C).No.7511 OF 2020
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY-2013-14 DATED 01.03.2016FOR AY-2013-14 DATED 01.03.2016
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S 156 DATED 01.03.2016 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT156 DATED 01.03.2016 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2013-14 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 12.04.201614 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 12.04.2016
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY 2014-15 DATED 22.12.2016 BY THE1ST RESPONDENTFOR AY 2014-15 DATED 22.12.2016 BY THE1ST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P5
A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S 156 DATED 22.12.2016 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT156 DATED 22.12.2016 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P6
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2014-15 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 25.01.201715 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 25.01.2017
EXHIBIT P7
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY 2017-18 DATED 19.12.2019 ISSUEDBY THE FIRST RESPONDENTFOR AY 2017-18 DATED 19.12.2019 ISSUEDBY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P8
A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S 156 DATED 19.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT156 DATED 19.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P9
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2017-18 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 15.01.2020.18 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 15.01.2020.
EXHIBIT P10A TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION U/S 143(1)AY 2015-16 DATED 10.10.2016 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.143(1)AY 2015-16 DATED 10.10.2016 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P11
A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND NOTICE 12.02.2020 FOR 20% OF TAX FOR AY 2013-14,2014-15,2015-16 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENTNOTICE 12.02.2020 FOR 20% OF TAX FOR AY 2013-14,2014-15,2015-16 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
WP(C).No.7511 OF 2020
EXHIBIT P12
A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED 11.02.202O OF 20% OF TAX FOR AY 2017-18 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
//TRUE COPY//PA TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.