Wp(C)/7600/2020 Of The Amballur Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
12 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/7600/2020 Of The Amballur Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
12 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/7600/2020 Of The Amballur Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 22ND PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.7600 OF 2020(Y)
PETITIONER/S:
THE AMBALLUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.503NO.503, MANNAMPETTA, P.O.VARAKKARA, ALAGAPPANAGAR, THRISSUR-680 302, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN, S.T.NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 001AAYAKAR BHAVAN, S.T.NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 001
2THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,OFFICER, THRISSUR-680 001OFFICER, THRISSUR-680 001
WARD 2 (1), THRISSUR, OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX
BY SC JOSE JOSEPH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON12.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 12th day of March 2020
The petitioner, a primary agriculturalcredit society and an assesse on the files ofthe 2[nd] respondent, is aggrieved by thecondition of payment of 20% of the demandsfor grant of stay, pending consideration ofExts.P4 and P9 appeals filed against Exts.P2
and P7 assessment orders.
2. Considering the nature of thecontentions raised, and the fact of thecondition of payment of 20% of the taxassessed imposed on similarly situatedsocieties being held to be bad by a DivisionBench in its judgment in W.A.No.1529 of 2019,this writ petition is disposed of directingconsideration of Exts.P4 and P9 appeals onmerit, without insisting for remittance of20% as demanded under Ext.P5. The recoveryproceedings based on Exts.P2 and P7assessment orders shall be kept in abeyance
WP(C).No.7600 OF 2020 3
till the appeals are decided. The 1[st]respondent shall endevour to dispose of theappeals as expeditiously as possible.The writ petition is disposed ofaccordingly.
Sd/-V.G.ARUNJUDGE
uu12.03.2020
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGITRATION ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) THRISSUR DATED 28.5.14REGITRATION ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) THRISSUR DATED 28.5.14
EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 5.12.2019DATED 5.12.2019
EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE COMPUTATION SHEET
EXHIBIT P4
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 21.1.202021.1.2020
EXHIBIT P5
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 4.2.20204.2.2020
EXHIBIT P6TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 12/2/2020DATED 12/2/2020
EXHIBIT P7TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 23.12.2019DATED 23.12.2019
EXHIBIT P8TRUE COPY OF THE COMPUTATION SHEET
EXHIBIT P9TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 21.1.202021.1.2020
EXHIBIT P10TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 4.2.20204.2.2020
EXHIBIT P11TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 12.2.2020DATED 12.2.2020
EXHIBIT P12TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 6.3.20206.3.2020
EXHIBIT P13
TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 1.7.20191.7.2019
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.