Wp(C)/7668/2016 Of M/S. City Centre Builders And Developers v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
High Court
02 Jun 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/7668/2016 Of M/S. City Centre Builders And Developers v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Date of order
02 Jun 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/7668/2016 Of M/S. City Centre Builders And Developers v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal under Section 253 of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: When a cross objection is filed in an appeal,it has to be treated as an independent appeal and has to bedecided irrespective of the fact as to whether the appeal filedby the department has been dismissed on whatever grounds.There is no doubt about the above proposition.
Decision: Hence, this writ petition is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
THURSDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE 2016/12TH JYAISHTA, 1938
WP(C).No. 7668 of 2016 (G)
---------------------------
PETITIONER :
----------------------
CITY CENTRE BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS,
CITY CENTRE, ROUND WEST, THRISSUR -680 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. C.A.SALEEM.
BY ADVS.SRI.A.KUMAR SRI.P.J.ANILKUMAR SMT.G.MINI SRI.P.S.SREE PRASAD SRI.JACOB JOHN (TRIVANDRUM)
RESPONDENT(S):
-----------------------------
1. INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH, KAKKANAD 682 030 COCHIN BENCH, KAKKANAD 682 030
2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
ERNAKULAM- 682 017
3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), THRISSUR -680 001 CIRCLE 2(1), THRISSUR -680 001
R1 TO R3 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02-06-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 7668 of 2016 (G)
-----------------------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------------------------
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29-12-2006
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22-10-1997
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15/05/2009 IN ITA NO.907/COCH/2007
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 04-01-2011 IN ITA NO.420/09
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED IN REMAND PROCEEDINGS DATED 28/03/2013
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY CIT (APPEALS) DATED 16/10/2014 16/10/2014
EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF CROSS OBJECTION DATED 27/04/2015 27/04/2015
EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE ITAT IN ITA NO.72/COCH/2015 AND CROSS OBJECTION NO .09/COCH/2015 DATED 22/01/2016 CROSS OBJECTION NO .09/COCH/2015 DATED 22/01/2016
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
------------------------------------------
NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
sts
A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
-------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No. 7668 of 2016
--------------------------------------
Dated this the 2[nd] day of June, 2016
JUDGMENT
The petitioner challenges Ext.P8 to the extent that the
cross objection filed by the petitioner has been dismissed asinfructuous.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearned standing counsel appearing for the respondent.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
3.Cross objection is filed under Section 253(4) of theIncome Tax Act. When a cross objection is filed in an appeal,it has to be treated as an independent appeal and has to bedecided irrespective of the fact as to whether the appeal filedby the department has been dismissed on whatever grounds.There is no doubt about the above proposition. The appellateauthority was therefore not justified in rejecting the crossobjection as infructuous.
Hence, this writ petition is allowed. Ext.P8 to the extentof dismissing the cross objection is set aside. There will be a
direction to the first respondent to consider the cross objection
No.09/Coch/2015 filed by the petitioner and final order shallbe passed after hearing the petitioner within a period of threemonths from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
It is made clear that the interim order dated 4.4.2016 inI.A.No.4607 of 2016 shall continue until the disposal of thecross objection.
Sd/-
A.M. SHAFFIQUE
JUDGE
Scl/3.06.2016
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.