Wp(C)/7690/2020 Of Kayamkulam Co-Operative Bank Ltd.no.a 421 v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
12 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/7690/2020 Of Kayamkulam Co-Operative Bank Ltd.no.a 421 v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
12 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/7690/2020 Of Kayamkulam Co-Operative Bank Ltd.no.a 421 v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 22ND PHALGUNA, 1941WP(C).No.7690 OF 2020(I)
PETITIONER:
KAYAMKULAM CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.A 421,KRISHNAPURAM P.O, KAYAMKULAM, PIN 690 533, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.JOJOSHRI.ARUN B.
RESPONDENTS:
1INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-5, ALAPPUZHA, A N PURAM P.O, ALAPPUZHA 688 011.
2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIOENR OF INCOME TAX,PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING, KOTTAYAM TOWN P.O 686 002.
3THE BRANCH MANAGER,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK, KAYAMKULAM MAIN BRANCH, KAYAMKULAM P.O, PIN-690 106.
R1-2 BY SC JOSE JOSEPH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON12.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 12th day of March 2020
The prayer in the writ petition is foran expeditious disposal of Exhibit P3-appeal andto keep the recovery proceedings which has beeninitiated through Exhibit P5-garnishee notice inabeyance, till the appeal is finally heard anddisposed of.
2.The petitioner refers to a judgment ofthe Division Bench of this Court inW.A.No.1536/2019 and connected cases, whereinthe Division Bench had directed disposal of theappeals filed by the Primary Agricultural CreditSocieties without insisting for payment of 20%of the tax assessed.3.Following the Division Bench judgment, Iam inclined to dispose of this writ petitiondirecting the 2[nd] respondent to consider anddecide on Exhibit P3-appeal within a period ofthree months from the date of receipt of a copy
of this judgment.
4.In the meanwhile, further proceedingspursuant to Exhibit P4-letter of demand andExhibit P5-garnishee notice shall be kept inabeyance.
5.The learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that pursuant to Exhibit P5, the
account of the petitioner has already been frozen by the department.
6.In the nature of the directions issued
above, the first respondent is directed tode-freeze the account of the petitioner and topermit banking operations till the appeal isfinally disposed.
The writ petition is disposed as
above.
SSK/13/3
Sd/-
V.G.ARUNJUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY2017-18 DATED 23-12-2019 ISSUED BY THEFIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S 156DATED 23-12-2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRSTRESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2017-18BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 30-12-2019.EXHIBIT P4A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF DEMAND FOR 20%OF TAX DATED 03-02-2020 ISSUED BY THE 1STRESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL
SSK //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.