Wp(C)/7786/2015 Of M/S.trupti Enterprises Pvt.ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
01 Sep 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Wp(C)/7786/2015 Of M/S.trupti Enterprises Pvt.ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
01 Sep 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/7786/2015 Of M/S.trupti Enterprises Pvt.ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Decision: Considering the submissions made, we direct opposite party No.2 to dispose of the petitioners application under Section 154 of the I.T.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
01.09.2015 Heard Mr. Pati, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Acharya, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department.
In the present writ application, the petitioner-company has sought for a direction to opposite party No.2 to dispose of its application under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 within a reasonable time.
Mr. Acharya, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Department on instruction submits that the application has been filed by the petitioner and the same remains pending consideration.
Considering the submissions made, we direct opposite party No.2 to dispose of the petitioners application under Section 154 of the I.T. Act, 1961 for rectification within a period of two months from today.
With the aforesaid direction, the writ application is disposed of.
Free copy of this order be handed over to the learned counsel for the revenue for necessary communication and compliance.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
..
I. Mahant
y,J.
......
Dr. D.P. Choudhury,J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue