Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/7842/2019 Of Vegetable And Fruit P...

Wp(C)/7842/2019 Of Vegetable And Fruit Promotion Council v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions)

High Court 15 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/7842/2019 Of Vegetable And Fruit Promotion Council v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions)
Date of order
15 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/7842/2019 Of Vegetable And Fruit Promotion Council v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above. akv Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX -4- EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION DATED 6.3.2019 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE ASST.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY ,THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 24TH PHALGUNA, 1940 WP(C).No. 7842 of 2019 PETITIONER: VEGETABLE AND FRUIT PROMOTION COUNCIL, KERALAM, MYTHRI BHAVAN, CSEZ-P.O., NEAR DOORADARSHAN KENDRA, KAKKANAD,KOCHI-682 037-RERPESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SHRI SAJI JOHN BY ADVS. SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.) SMT.DIVYA RAVINDRAN SMT.NISHA JOHN SRI.R.BHASKARA KRISHNAN SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN RESPONDENTS: 1THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS)2ND FLOOR,SAN JUAN TOWERS, I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-682 018 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-III,28/243, “POORNIMA”, NEAR MANORAMA JUNCTION, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI-682 036. SMT. THUSHARA JAMES, GOVERNMENT PLEADERSRI. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, STANDING COUNSEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The petitioner, impugning Exts. P1, P3 and P5 assessmentorders filed appeals for the amenment years 2011 to 2012 and2016 to 2017. Exts. P2, P4 and P6 are the appeals pending beforethe second respondent. The petitioner also moved stayapplications. There shall be a direction to the secondrespondent to dispose the stay applications produced as Exts. P9to P12 within a period of two months. Till then, recoveryproceedings shall be stayed. The writ petition is disposed of as above. akv Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX -4- EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION DATED 6.3.2019 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2016-17 EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION DATED 11.3.2019 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2011-12 EXHIBIT P12TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION DATED 6.3.2019 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2016-17 RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS:NIL. //TRUE COPY// CA TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan