Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/7944/2016 Of Vijayan Thomas @ Thom...

Wp(C)/7944/2016 Of Vijayan Thomas @ Thomas Cleophas v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 20 Jun 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/7944/2016 Of Vijayan Thomas @ Thomas Cleophas v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
20 Jun 2016
Assessment year(s)
2008-09, 2009-10
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/7944/2016 Of Vijayan Thomas @ Thomas Cleophas v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/30TH JYAISHTA, 1938 WP(C).No. 7944 of 2016 (P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S):------------- VIJAYAN THOMAS @ THOMAS CLEOPHAS, N.M 35/751,KALLUVILA VEEDU, 2C STREET, NEYYATTINKARA P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 121, REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, GOPALAKRISHNAN, KARMALA BHAVAN, CHATHANNOOR P.O, KOLLAM - 691 572. BY ADVS.SRI.S.SANTHOSH KUMAR SMT.P.LISSY JOSE. RESPONDENT(S):-------------- 1. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIYAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 003. 2. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1(3) O/O THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-1, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003. 3. THE SPECIAL GRADE SECRETARY, PANANCHERY GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PATTIKAD P.O, THRISSUR - 680 652. 4. THE PROJECT MANAGER, DISTRICT PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT(DPMU) KERALA RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION AGENCY (KRWSA), PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 679 321. R1 & R2 BY SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT R3 BY ADV. SRI.A.C.DEVY R4 BY ADV. SRI.D.KISHORE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-06-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/ WP(C).No. 7944 of 2016 (P) -------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS----------------------- EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE INCOME TAX COMPUTATION FORM ISSUED BYTHE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09 EXHIBIT P1(A) TRUE COPY OF INCOME TAX COMPUTATION FORM ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10 THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED 13/01/2016 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENTASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2(A) TRUE COPY OF NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED 13/01/2016 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF TDS CERTIFICATE DATED 28/08/08 ISSUED BYTHE 3RD RESPONDENTTHE 3RD RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3(A) TRUE COPY OF TDS CERTIFICATE DATED 17/03/09 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF TDS CERTIFICATE DATED 28/04/08 ISSUED BYTHE 4TH RESPONDENTTHE 4TH RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P4(A) TRUE COPY OF TDS CERTIFICATE DATED 31/05/09 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF PETITION DATED 06/01/2016 OF THEPETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09 EXHIBIT P5(A) TRUE COPY OF PETITION DATED 06/01/2016 OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10 PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10 EXHIBIT P5(B) TRUE COPY OF PETITION DATED 06/01/2016 OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2007-08 AND 2008-09 PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2007-08 AND 2008-09 EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF INSTRUCTION NO 5/2013 DATED 08/07/2013 OFTHE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXESTHE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF PETITION DATED 08/02/2016 FILED BY THEPETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. Msv/ WP(C).No. 7944 of 2016 (P) -------------------------- EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE RECTIFICATION APPLICATIONDTD.15.3.2015 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009. EXHIBIT P8(a) TRUE COPY OF THE RECTIFICATION APPLICATION DTD.15.3.2016 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010. EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DTD.13.1.2016 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009. EXHIBIT P9(a) TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DTD.13.1.2016 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: ------------------------ NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/ A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J. ------------------------------------ EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF PETITION DATED 08/02/2016 FILED BY THEPETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. Msv/ WP(C).No. 7944 of 2016 (P) -------------------------- EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE RECTIFICATION APPLICATIONDTD.15.3.2015 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009. EXHIBIT P8(a) TRUE COPY OF THE RECTIFICATION APPLICATION DTD.15.3.2016 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010. EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DTD.13.1.2016 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009. EXHIBIT P9(a) TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DTD.13.1.2016 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: ------------------------ NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/ A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C).No.7944 of 2016 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 20[th] day of June, 2016 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a Contractor from whom tax was deducted atsource and TDS certificates were issued. The work was done onbehalf of respondents 3 and 4. 2. It is submitted that, when TDS statement was filed byrespondents 3 and 4, there occurred some mistake. As a result ofwhich, the amount collected as TDS was not given credit, thoughthe assessment was complete. The petitioner had been repeatedlyrequesting respondents 3 and 4 to make necessary rectification inthe TDS statement. But so far they have not taken any action inthat regard and as a consequence, the petitioner is deprived of hugeamounts which had been collected as TDS. Having regard to the aforesaid factual situation, I am of theview that this writ petition can be disposed of with the followingdirections : 1. Respondents 3 and 4 shall take appropriatesteps to ensure that the mistake in the TDSstatement is rectified. It shall be done within aperiod of two months from the date of receipt ofa copy of this judgment. AV 2. If no such steps are taken by respondents 3 and 4, it shall be open for the petitioner to recover the said amount from respondents 3 and 4. Sd/- A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan