Wp(C)/7950/2016 Of Archdiocese Of Verapoly v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2016/10TH JYAISHTA, 1938 WP(C).No. 7950 of 2016 (P) --------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------------- ARCHDIOCESE OF VERAPOLY, LATIN ARCHBISHOPS HOUSE, MARINE DRIVE, ERNAKULAM-682 031, REPRESENTED BY PROCURATOR (F.A), FR.JEROME CHAMMINIKODATH. BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIR SRI.R.SREEJITH KUM.SOUMYA PRAKASH KUM.MEKHALA M.BENNY RESPONDENTS: -------------------------- 1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS),COCHIN,ERNAKULAM-682 018.COCHIN,ERNAKULAM-682 018. 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), COCHIN,ERNAKULAM-682 016. 3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), COCHIN,ERNAKULAM-682 018. BY SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31-05-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 18.03.2015 P2 TRUE COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 P3 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 P4 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT ORDER DATED 08.07.2015 P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 27.11.2015 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:NIL-------------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.=============W.P. (C) No. 7950 of 2016=================== Dated this, the 31[st] day of May, 2016 J U D G M E N T Petitioner challenges Ext.P6, the conditional order grantedby the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-III, Kochidirecting the petitioner to pay 30% of the tax demanded in 7equal instalments of `7,08,564/- each starting from January,2016. 2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that theinstalments are being paid. The only request now made is foran early disposal of the appeal itself. 3.Having regard to the limited nature of the requestmade, I am of the view that direction can be granted to theappellate authority, the 2[nd] respondent, to consider disposal ofExt.P2, as expeditiously as possible, at least within a period offour months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Rp31/05/2016 Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE //True Copy// P.S to Judge