Wp(C)/7989/2020 Of Pattanakkad Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
16 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/7989/2020 Of Pattanakkad Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
16 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/7989/2020 Of Pattanakkad Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal, inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
MONDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 26TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.7989 OF 2020(W)
PETITIONER:
PATTANAKKAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITEDREPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PATTANAKAD P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA-690531.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.G.ARUN (K/795/2004)SMT.V.JAYA RAGISRI.R.HARIKRISHNAN (KAMBISSERIL)SRI.NEERAJ NARAYAN
RESPONDENTS:
1COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)BAKER HILLS, KOTTAYAM-686002.
2INCOME TAX OFFICER,A.N.PURAM, ALAPPUZHA-688011.
WARD 5, ALAPPUZHA, ARATTUKULANKARA COMPLEX,
SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON16.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a
direction to dispose of Ext.P3 appeal and Ext.P5 staypetition preferred before the first respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against Ext.P2assessment order.
2. Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,
this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal, inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment withoutinsisting on payment of 20% of the tax demanded, as percircular of 2017. Till such time a decision is taken on theappeal, recovery proceedings pursuant to the assessmentorder shall be kept in abeyance.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE RETURN OF INCOME DATED 30.03.2018 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18.
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 26.12.2019 ALONG WITH THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DATED 26.12.2019 ISSUED FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 23.01.2020 FILED FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 06.02.2020 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5
A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION FORSTAY DATED 10.02.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.