W.p.(C)/8043/2017 Of Manoj Mittal Huf v. Income Tax Officer Ward
High Court
19 Jan 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
W.p.(C)/8043/2017 Of Manoj Mittal Huf v. Income Tax Officer Ward
Date of order
19 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In W.p.(C)/8043/2017 Of Manoj Mittal Huf v. Income Tax Officer Ward, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: The petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~8
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8043/2017 MANOJ MITTAL HUF ..... Petitioner
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Advocate
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD NO 36(4) ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Senior Standing Counsel
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R% 19.01.2018
Learned counsel for the assessee states that the refund order has
been issued. We were inclined to impose costs, but it is stated that the refund order was passed on the date, when the writ petition itself was listed and there was a demand, which was deleted vide order dated 26.5.2017. We are, therefore, not imposing costs.
The petition is disposed of.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
JANUARY 19, 2018/tp
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue