Wp(C)/8066/2012 Of M/S.cordiant Technologies Pvt.ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-I(1)
High Court
30 Mar 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/8066/2012 Of M/S.cordiant Technologies Pvt.ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-I(1)
Date of order
30 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/8066/2012 Of M/S.cordiant Technologies Pvt.ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-I(1), the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.I am satisfied that before the appellate authority couldconsider and pass orders on Ext.P3 stay petition, it is unjust to initiatecoercive recovery proceedings for recovery of the amount disputed.Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the followingdirections: The 2[nd] respondent shal...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2012/10TH CHAITHRA 1934
WP(C).No. 8066 of 2012 (G)
--------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
------------------------
M/S.CORDIANT TECHNOLOGIES PVT.LTD., AGED 48 YEARS
28/2816 D, INDIRA NAGAR, KADAVANTHRA NEAR YMCA KOCHI-682020.
BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIR SRI.J.R.PREM NAVAZ SMT.NIVEDITA A.KAMATH
RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-I(1) KOCHI.682 001. KOCHI.682 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS) ERNAKULAM.682 016. ERNAKULAM.682 016.
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
30-03-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS
EXT.P1:-TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 30-11-2011 ISSUED TO THEPETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2:-TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2NDRESPONDENT.
EXT.P3:-TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THESECOND RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
tss
S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -W.P.(C)No.8066 of 2012
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 30[th] day of March, 2012
J U D G M E N T
Against Ext.P1 assessment order, the petitioner has filed Ext.P2appeal along with Ext.P3 stay petition. The petitioner's grievance isthat during the pendency of the stay petition, coercive recoveryproceedings have been initiated by the assessing authority forrecovery of the disputed amount.
2.I have heard the learned Government Pleader also.
3.I am satisfied that before the appellate authority couldconsider and pass orders on Ext.P3 stay petition, it is unjust to initiatecoercive recovery proceedings for recovery of the amount disputed.Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the followingdirections:
The 2[nd] respondent shall consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 staypetition, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one monthfrom the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Till ordersare passed on Ext.P3, coercive recovery proceedings for recovery ofthe disputed amount in Ext.P2 shall be kept in abeyance.
Sd/-
S. SIRI JAGAN
JUDGE//True copy//
P.A. TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.