Wp(C)/8135/2017 Of M/S. Thomson Granites Pvt Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
10 Mar 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/8135/2017 Of M/S. Thomson Granites Pvt Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
10 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/8135/2017 Of M/S. Thomson Granites Pvt Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2017/19TH PHALGUNA, 1938
WP(C).No. 8135 of 2017 (N) ---------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-------------
M/S. THOMSON GRANITES PVT LTD.,
X/616, KOMBODINJAMAKKAL, THAZHEKKAD, THRISSUR - 680697, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SHRI.P.T.JOHNSON
BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.)
SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN SMT.VANDANA MENON SMT.DIVYA RAVINDRAN
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), THRISSUR - 680001. CIRCLE 1(1), THRISSUR - 680001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF IN COME TAX (APPEALS) AAYAKAR BHAWAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR - 680001. AAYAKAR BHAWAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR - 680001.
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC,
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-03-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 8135 of 2017 (N)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS :NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.-------------------------------
W.P.(C).NO.8135 OF 2017 (N)-----------------------------------
Dated this the 10[th] day of March, 2017
J U D G M E N T
Against Ext.P1 order of assessment for the assessment year2014-15, under the Income Tax Act, the petitioner had preferredExt.P2 appeal together with Ext.P3 stay petition before the 2[nd]respondent. The limited prayer of the petitioner is for a direction tothe 2[nd] respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 stay petition,expeditiously, after hearing the petitioner, and to keep in abeyancethe recovery proceedings, pursuant to Ext.P1, till then.
2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitionerand also the learned Government Pleader appearing for therespondents.
On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case asalso the submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petitionwith the following directions:
1. The 2[nd] respondent shall consider and pass orderson Ext.P3 stay petition within a period of one monthfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment,after hearing the petitioner.
2. I make it clear that, till such time are orders arepassed by the 2[nd] respondent, as directed, andcommunicated to the petitioner, further proceedingsfor recovery of amounts confirmed against thepetitioner by Ext.P1 order of assessment, shall be keptin abeyance.
3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writpetition along with a copy of this judgment, before the2[nd] respondent, for further action.
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.