Wp(C)/8165/2020 Of The Paravatty Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
17 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/8165/2020 Of The Paravatty Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
17 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/8165/2020 Of The Paravatty Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.8165 OF 2020(U)
PETITIONER/S:
THE PAVARATTY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.3918,P.O PAVARATTY, THRISSUR680 507, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
BY ADVS.SRI.P.C.SASIDHARANSRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT/S:
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)
AAYAKAR BHAVAN, S.T.NAGAR, THRISSUR-680001.
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 2, GURUVAYOOR, OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WEST NADA, GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR-680101.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON17.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to
dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the firstrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, the
writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting on paymentof 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017. Till suchtime a decision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance.
sab
SD/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
P1: TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED10.11.201910.11.2019
P2: TRUE COPY OF DEMAND NOTICE DATED 10.11.2019
P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 7.12.2019
P4: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.1.2020
P5: TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 24.1.2020
P6: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 1.7.2019 IN W.A 1536 OF 20191536 OF 2019
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.