Wp(C)/8193/2020 Of The Edarikode Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
17 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/8193/2020 Of The Edarikode Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
17 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/8193/2020 Of The Edarikode Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.8193 OF 2020(Y)
PETITIONER:
THE EDARIKODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITEDNO.10739,EDARIKODE P.O., MALAPPURAM,PIN-676 501, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOZHIKODE-673 001
2THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 3, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,PIN-676 001
SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON17.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 17th day of March 2020
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction todispose of Ext.P2 appeal preferred before the firstrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) againstthe assessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment withoutinsisting on payment of 20% of the tax demanded, as percircular of 2017. Till such time a decision is taken on theappeal, recovery proceedings pursuant to the assessmentorder shall be kept in abeyance.
dlk/17.03.2020
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 24.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENTFOR THE PERIOD 2017-18
EXHIBIT P2
COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE PERIOD 2017-18 DATED 22.01.2020
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.