Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/8193/2020 Of The Edarikode Service...

Wp(C)/8193/2020 Of The Edarikode Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)

High Court 17 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/8193/2020 Of The Edarikode Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
17 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/8193/2020 Of The Edarikode Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1941 WP(C).No.8193 OF 2020(Y) PETITIONER: THE EDARIKODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITEDNO.10739,EDARIKODE P.O., MALAPPURAM,PIN-676 501, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT/S: 1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOZHIKODE-673 001 2THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 3, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,PIN-676 001 SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON17.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Dated this the 17th day of March 2020 Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction todispose of Ext.P2 appeal preferred before the firstrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) againstthe assessment order Ext.P1. 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment withoutinsisting on payment of 20% of the tax demanded, as percircular of 2017. Till such time a decision is taken on theappeal, recovery proceedings pursuant to the assessmentorder shall be kept in abeyance. dlk/17.03.2020 Sd/- AMIT RAWAL JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 24.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENTFOR THE PERIOD 2017-18 EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE PERIOD 2017-18 DATED 22.01.2020
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan