Wp(C)/8279/2020 Of M/S.rajesh Mathew And Compnay v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
17 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/8279/2020 Of M/S.rajesh Mathew And Compnay v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
17 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/8279/2020 Of M/S.rajesh Mathew And Compnay v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.8279 OF 2020(H)
PETITIONER:
M/S.RAJESH MATHEW AND COMPNAY,CHERUMATTATHIL BUILDING, POST OFFICE JUNCTION, MUVATTUPUZHA ARAKUZHA ROAD, ERNAKULAM - 686 661, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, RAJESH MATHEW, S/O.ISSAC MATHEW.
BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU
RESPONDENTS:
SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON17.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court, seeking adirection to the appellate authority to dispose of the appealand interim application preferred against the assessmentorder issued by the second respondent - Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals).
2.Though this Court ought not to have interfered,but in the interest of justice, without expressing any opinion,this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P4 application for stayfiled along with Ext.P3 appeal in accordance with law, afteraffording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within aperiod of three months from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis judgment.
nak
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSEDBY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 15-12-2019
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF DEMAND NOTICE DATED 15-12-2019 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P3
TRUE COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P4
TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDNET
EXHIBIT P5
TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 26-2-2020 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT SERVED ON 4.3.2020
//TRUE COPY//
P.A TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.