Wp(C)/8306/2020 Of Kanhirode Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
17 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/8306/2020 Of Kanhirode Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
17 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/8306/2020 Of Kanhirode Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to thethird respondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of a...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1941WP(C).No.8306 OF 2020(K)
PETITIONER:
KANHIRODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDKANHORODE P.O.KANNUR-670 592, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY PRADEEPAN K.
BY ADV. SRI.S.ARUN RAJ
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD-1 AND TPS, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KANNUR-670 006.WARD-1 AND TPS, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KANNUR-670 006.
2THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,AAYAKAR BHAVAN, NORTH BLOCK, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE-673 001.AAYAKAR BHAVAN, NORTH BLOCK, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE-673 001.
3THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE-673 001.AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE-673 001.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON17.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.8306 OF 2020
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking adirection to dispose of Ext.P2 appeal preferred before thethird respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)against the assessment order Ext.P1.
2.
Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,
the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to thethird respondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgmentwithout insisting on payment of 20% of the tax demanded,as per circular of 2017. Till such time a decision is takenon the appeal, recovery proceedings pursuant to theassessment order shall be kept in abeyance.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
vv
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 31.12.2015 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143 (3) OF THE ACT FOR THE AY 2017-18
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST APPEAL FILED BYTHE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2017-18
EXHIBIT P3
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION OF STAY FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1STRESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2017-18
EXHIBIT P4
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26.2.2020PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DISPOSINGTHE STAY PETITION FOR THE AY 2017-18
//TRUE COPY//PA TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.