Case Law › High Court › Wp(C)/8376/2019 Of Gireesh Sreedhara Kur...

Wp(C)/8376/2019 Of Gireesh Sreedhara Kurup v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 20 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

20 Mar 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/8376/2019 Of Gireesh Sreedhara Kurup v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: This writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY,THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 29TH PHALGUNA, 1940 WP(C).No. 8376 of 2019 PETITIONER: GIREESH SREEDHARA KURUP,RAMCO HOME APPLIANCES, PULIYANETH BUILDING, NH 47- HARIPAD-690514, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SENIOR.)SMT.DIVYA RAVINDRANSRI.V.P.NARAYANAN RESPONDENTS: OTHER PRESENT: SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No.8376/2019 J U D G M E N T The petitioner, as against Ext.P2 order, filed Ext.P3 appealbefore the 3[rd] respondent. The petitioner also filed Ext.P3(a) stayapplication. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shallbe a direction to the 3[rd] respondent-Tribunal to consider the stayapplication filed by the petitioner within a period of two months, afterissuing notice to the petitioner. Till disposal of the stay application, allrecovery proceedings based on the assessment order shall be kept inabeyance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE smp W.P.(C) No.8376/2019 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: True Copy P.S to Judge smp

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.