W.p.(C)/8382/2017 Of Aaa Portfolios Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), New Delhi
High Court
17 Nov 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
W.p.(C)/8382/2017 Of Aaa Portfolios Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), New Delhi
Date of order
17 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In W.p.(C)/8382/2017 Of Aaa Portfolios Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), New Delhi, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to raise all contentions and issues in the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~4.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8382/2017 AAA PORTFOLIOS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Simran Mehta & Ms. Jyoti Sagar, Advocates. versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing
Counsel.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
%
O R D E R17.11.2017
Counsel for the petitioner states that an appeal has been preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Tribunal dated 20[th] January, 2016 in ITA No. 2483/Del/2014. He submits that the petitioner would raise all issues and contentions, which are raised in the present writ petition in the statutory appeal.
In view of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to raise all contentions and issues in the appeal. We clarify that we have not expressed any opinion on merits.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
NOVEMBER 17, 2017
VKR
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue