Case LawHigh Court › W.p.(C)/8387/2017 Of Samdariya Builders...

W.p.(C)/8387/2017 Of Samdariya Builders Private Limited v. Income Tax Settlement Commission & Anr

High Court 11 Feb 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
W.p.(C)/8387/2017 Of Samdariya Builders Private Limited v. Income Tax Settlement Commission & Anr
Date of order
11 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In W.p.(C)/8387/2017 Of Samdariya Builders Private Limited v. Income Tax Settlement Commission & Anr, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn along with the pending application but in the above terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8387/2017, C.M. APPL.34537/2017 SAMDARIYA BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... PetitionerThrough : Sh. N.P. Sahni with Sh. Ruchesh Sinha and Ms. Jyoti Sharma, Advocates.versusINCOME TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION & ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Standing Counsel and Sh. Dushyant Sarna, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R % 11.02.2019 The Court has heard learned counsel for the parties. During the course of the hearing, the Court was of the opinion that it would not be appropriate to exercise writ jurisdiction in respect of the impugned order since the petitioner is an assessee subject to the jurisdiction of the income tax authorities at Madhya Pradesh. In view of the matter, learned counsel sought liberty to withdraw the writ petition and approach the Madhya Pradesh High Court. However, he also sought extension of interim order which had bound the parties till date. In view of the statement made, the interim order which has enured in favour of the petitioner shall continue for three weeks. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn along with the pending application but in the above terms. Order dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J FEBRUARY 11, 2019/AJK PRATEEK JALAN, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan