Wp(C)/8470/2020 Of Arackal Service Co Operative Bank v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
18 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/8470/2020 Of Arackal Service Co Operative Bank v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
18 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18, 2011-12
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/8470/2020 Of Arackal Service Co Operative Bank v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1[st] respondentto take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal in accordance with law, afteraffording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within aperiod of three months from the date of receipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 28TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.8470 OF 2020(G)
PETITIONER/S:
ARACKAL SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANKARACKAL, EDAYAM P.O, KOLLAM 691 532, REPRESENTED BYITS SECRETARY
BY ADVS.SRI.R.SUNIL KUMARSMT.A.SALINI LAL
RESPONDENT/S:
1COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)AAYYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 0032INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1 AND TPS, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, NEAR KARBALA JUNCTION, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, KOLLAM 691 001
SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON18.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction todispose of Ext.P2 appeal preferred before the 1[st]respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment order, Exts.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1[st] respondentto take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal in accordance with law, afteraffording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within aperiod of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment without insisting on payment of 20% of the taxdemanded, as per circular of 2017. Till such time a decision istaken on the appeal, recovery proceedings pursuant to theassessment orders shall be kept in abeyance.
Sd/
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE
YEAR 2017-18
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL IN FORM NUMBER 35 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18
EXHIBIT P3
TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION PREFERRED ALONG WITH EXHIBIT P2
EXHIBIT P4
TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DATED 19/12/2019
EXHIBIT P5
TRUE COPY OF THE STAY ORDER ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONER INTHE APPEAL PREFERRED FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2015-16 AND2016-17.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.