Wp(C)/8512/2020 Of The Vellarakkad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
18 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/8512/2020 Of The Vellarakkad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
18 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/8512/2020 Of The Vellarakkad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 28TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.8512 OF 2020(L)
PETITIONER/S:
THE VELLARAKKAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO 154,P.O.VELLARAKKAD, THRISSUR DIST 680 584, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)AAYAKAR BHAVAN. S.T NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 001.AAYAKAR BHAVAN. S.T NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 001.
2THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD-2, GURUVAYUR, OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WEST NADA, GURUVAYOOR-680 101
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI JOSE JJOSEPH SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON18.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction todispose of Exts.P3, P8, P13 and P18 appeals and Exts.P5, P10and P15 and P20 interim applications preferred before the firstrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment orders Exts.P1, P6, P11 and P16.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on appeals, Exts.P3, P8, P13 andP18, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three months fromthe date of receipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting onpayment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017.Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal, recoveryproceedings pursuant to the assessment orders shall be kept inabeyance.
SD/
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 1.3.2016 ALONG WITH COMPUTATION SHEET
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 1.3.2016
EXHIBIT P3EXHIBIT P4EXHIBIT P5
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 14.6.2016TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 19.10.2016TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 30.11.2016
EXHIBIT P6
TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 30.11.2017 ALONG WITH COMPUTATION SHEET
EXHIBIT P7EXHIBIT P8EXHIBIT P9EXHIBIT P10EXHIBIT P11
TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 30.11.2017
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 2.1.2018TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15.10.2019TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 16.10.2019
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 30.11.2017 ALONG WITH COMPUTATION SHEET
EXHIBIT P12EXHIBIT P13EXHIBIT P14EXHIBIT P15EXHIBIT P16
TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 30.11.2017
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 2.1.2018TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15.10.2019TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 16.10.2019
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 22.11.2019
EXHIBIT P17
TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 22.11.2019
EXHIBIT P18
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 26.12.2019
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.