Wp(C)/8565/2022 Of V-Guard Industries Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
15 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/8565/2022 Of V-Guard Industries Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
15 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/8565/2022 Of V-Guard Industries Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 15 DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 24TH PHALGUNA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 8565 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
V-GUARD INDUSTRIES LIMITED028, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR.MITHUN.K.CHITTILAPPILLYBY ADVS.ANIL D. NAIRTELMA RAJUEDATHARA VINEETA KRISHNANARAVIND SREEKUMAR
42/962, VENNALA HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, VENNALA , KOCHI-682
RESPONDENTS:
1ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCORPORATE CIRCLE 2 (1), KOCHI-682 0182ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI-110 0023PRINCIPAL COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOCHI-1, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, I.S PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-682 0184THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,KOCHI BENCH, 1ST FLOOR, BLOCK C-I & C-II, KENDRIYA BHAVAN, KAKKANAD, KERALA-682 037
OTHER PRESENT:
SC-SRI.JOSE JOSEPH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON15.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 8565 OF 2022
-:2:-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
-----------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No. 8565 of 2022
----------------------------------------
Dated this the 15[th] day of March, 2022JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment relating to
assessment year 2016-17, petitioner has preferred a secondappeal before the 4[th] respondent, a copy of which isproduced as Ext.P3. A petition for stay of proceedingspursuant to the assessment order has also been filed asExt.P4. Petitioner apprehends coercive proceedings to beeffected even before the petition for stay is considered.Hence this writ petition.
2. Having considered the submissions of the counsel
for the petitioner as well as the respondents, I am of theopinion that this writ petition itself can be disposed of witha direction.
3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the
4[th] respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 stay
WP(C) NO. 8565 OF 2022
-:3:-
petition, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such a decision istaken, all coercive proceedings initiated against thepetitioner shall be kept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
AJM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE
WP(C) NO. 8565 OF 2022
-:4:-
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 8565/2022
PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS :
Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 28.12.2018 ISSUED UNDER SEC.143 (3).Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE UNDER SECTION 263 DATED22.3.2021.
Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILEDBEFORE THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL.
Exhibit P4
Exhibit P5
TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BEFORE THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL.TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 15.02.2022 ALONG WITH THE ANNEXURES.
RESPONDENT’S EXHIBITS : NIL
AJM //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.