Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/8580/2020 Of Ramamangalam Service...

Wp(C)/8580/2020 Of Ramamangalam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 18 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/8580/2020 Of Ramamangalam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
18 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18, 2017-2018
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/8580/2020 Of Ramamangalam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 28TH PHALGUNA, 1941 WP(C).No.8580 OF 2020(V) PETITIONER: RAMAMANGALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.2156RAMAMANGALAM P.O., ERNAKULAM-686 663, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-IN- CHARGE. BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.JOJOSHRI.ARUN B. RESPONDENTS: 1INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD-2, THODUPUZHA P.O.THODUPUZHA-685 584. 2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-2,OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL REVENUE TOWER, KOCHI-682 002. SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON18.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before thesecond respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)against the assessment order Ext.P1. Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting onpayment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017.Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal, recoveryproceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be kept inabeyance. Sd/- AMIT RAWAL JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY 2017-18 DATED 19.12.2019 ISSUED BY THEFIRST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S 156 DATED 19.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2017-2018 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 10.1.2020 EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 4.3.2020 FOR 20% OF TAX.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan