Wp(C)/8580/2020 Of Ramamangalam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
18 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/8580/2020 Of Ramamangalam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
18 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18, 2017-2018
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/8580/2020 Of Ramamangalam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 28TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.8580 OF 2020(V)
PETITIONER:
RAMAMANGALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.2156RAMAMANGALAM P.O., ERNAKULAM-686 663, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-IN- CHARGE.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.JOJOSHRI.ARUN B.
RESPONDENTS:
1INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD-2, THODUPUZHA P.O.THODUPUZHA-685 584.
2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-2,OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL REVENUE TOWER, KOCHI-682 002.
SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON18.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a
direction to dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before thesecond respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)against the assessment order Ext.P1.
Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, the writ
petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting onpayment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017.Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal, recoveryproceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be kept inabeyance.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY 2017-18 DATED 19.12.2019 ISSUED BY THEFIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S 156 DATED 19.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2017-2018 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 10.1.2020
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 4.3.2020 FOR 20% OF TAX.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.