Case LawHigh Court › W.p.(C)/8616/2016 Of Krishan Kumar v. Co...

W.p.(C)/8616/2016 Of Krishan Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi -Xiv & Anr

High Court 26 Sep 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
W.p.(C)/8616/2016 Of Krishan Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi -Xiv & Anr
Date of order
26 Sep 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In W.p.(C)/8616/2016 Of Krishan Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi -Xiv & Anr, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8616/2016 & CM.Nos.35461-62/2016 KRISHAN KUMAR ..... Petitioner ..... Petitioner Through: Ms.Prem Lata Bansal, Sr.Adv. with Mr. Paras Chaudhary and Mr. R.A.Bansal, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI -XIV & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.P.Roy Chaudhury, Sr. Standing counsel. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA O R D E R % 26.09.2016 The assessee in this case challenges a notice under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, seeking reassessment of income for Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10. After some hearing during the course of which the court was of the opinion that the arguments could be best appreciated during the course of reassessment proceedings, learned counsel sought liberty to withdraw the writ petition with further liberty to urge the issue of legality of the impugned notice before the appropriate Tax Authority. Liberty granted on both grounds. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications also stand disposed of. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J SEPTEMBER 26, 2016/mr DEEPA SHARMA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan