Wp(C)/8630/2020 Of The Peringandoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
18 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/8630/2020 Of The Peringandoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
18 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/8630/2020 Of The Peringandoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 and P8 appeals inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing tothe petitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofrec...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 28TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.8630 OF 2020(C)
PETITIONER/S:
THE PERINGANDOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.297
11/102A, ATHANI P.O, ATHANI, THRISSUR 680 581, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)AAYAKAR BHAVAN, S.T NAGAR, THRISSUR 680 001AAYAKAR BHAVAN, S.T NAGAR, THRISSUR 680 001
2THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD 2(4), THRISSUR SHAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR,
THRISSUR 680 001.
SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON18.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction todispose of Exts.P3 and P8 appeals and Exts.P5 and P10 interimapplication preferred before the first respondent/Commissionerof Income Tax (Appeals) against the assessment orders Exts.P1and P6.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 and P8 appeals inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing tothe petitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting on paymentof 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017. Till suchtime a decision is taken on the appeals, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment orders shall be kept in abeyance.
Sd/
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 2/12/2019
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 2/12/2019
EXHIBIT P3
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 3/1/2020
EXHIBIT P4
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18/2/2020 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P5EXHIBIT P6
TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION 22/2/2020
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 1`7/12/2019
EXHIBIT P7
TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 17/12/2018
EXHIBIT P8
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 15/1/2020
EXHIBIT P9
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18/2/2020 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P10EXHIBIT P11
TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION 22/2/2020
TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 1/7/2019 INWA NO 1536 OF 2019
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.