Wp(C)/8791/2020 Of The Asthmichira Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
21 Apr 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/8791/2020 Of The Asthmichira Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
21 Apr 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/8791/2020 Of The Asthmichira Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to proceed with coercivesteps against the petitioner pending disposal of Ext.P2appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENTTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL 2020 / 1ST VAISAKHA, 1942
WP(C) NO. 8791 OF 2020
Petitioner :-
The Asthmichira Service Co-operative BankLimited No. 325, Asthamichira P.O., Astamichira,Thrissur District, Represented by its Secretary.
By Adv. Sri. O.D. Sivadas
-Respondents:
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),Ayakar Bhavan, Shaktan Nagar, Thrissur Pin 680 001.Ayakar Bhavan, Shaktan Nagar, Thrissur Pin 680 001.
2.The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (1),Shaktan Nagar, Thrissur Pin 680 001.
By
Standing Counsel Sri. Christopher Abraham, Income Tax
This writ petition having come up for admission on 21.04.2020, the court onthe same day delivered the following.
J U D G M E N T~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Dated this the 21[st] day of April, 2020
Standing Counsel for Income Tax takes notice forrespondents 1 and 2.
2.Petitioner is an income tax assessee. The
assessment year in question is 2013-'14. By Ext.P1, the 2[nd]respondent disallowed petitioner's claim for deduction underSection 80-P of the Income Tax Act and demanded₹36,59,360/- as tax. The petitioner filed Ext.P2 appealcontending that reasoning given in Ext.P1 is untenable.Pending the appeal, the 2[nd] respondent initiated coerciveproceedings.
3.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner andlearned Standing Counsel for Income Tax.
4.If the 2[nd] respondent proceeds with coercive
steps pending consideration of statutory appeal, the
WPC.8791/2020
statutory remedy available to the petitioner will be negatedand the petitioner is likely to be put to difficulties.
In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed
of directing the respondents not to proceed with coercivesteps against the petitioner pending disposal of Ext.P2appeal. Ext.P2 appeal shall be considered and disposed ofby the 1[st] respondent within a period of six months.
Sd/-N. NAGARESH, JUDGE
aks/21.04.2020
WPC.8791/2020
: 4 :
Appendix
Exhibit P1Copy of the assessment order dated 29.12.2016 issued by the 2[nd] respondent for the period 2013-14by the 2[nd] respondent for the period 2013-14
Exhibit P2Copy of the appeal filed by the petitioner before the 1[st]respondent for the period 2013-14.respondent for the period 2013-14.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.