W.p.(C)/879/2016 Of Smt. Usha Chaurasia v. Asstt.commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr

$-29 to 35 *IN THE HIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 879/2016SMT. USHA CHAUPIASIAPetitionerW.P.(C) 882/2016ARPIT CHAURASIAPetitionerW.P.(C) 883/2016KAMALA KANT CHAURASIAPetitionerW.P.(C) 885/2016KAMAL KISHORE CHAURASIA'..... PetitionerW.P.(CI 1008/2016NAVNfi'ET CHAURASIAPetitionerW.P.(CY 1009/2016ANAND KUMAR CHAURASIAPetitionerW.P.(C) 1010/2016KAMLA KANT AND COMPANYPetitioner + + + + + + Versus ASSTT.COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX & ANR. ..... RespondentsThrough:Mr. Satyen Sethi and Mr.Arta TranaPanda, Advocates for the Petitioners.Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda andMr. RaghvendraSingh, Advocates forthe Respondents. ~ , CORAM: HON'I^LE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHATHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER % 07.02.2017 In these cases, the claim is for refund of excess amounts paid toithesatisfaction of the Income Tax dues. Counsel for the petitioners states that inW.P.(C) No.882/2016and W.P.(C) No. 1009/2016, which are listed as ItemNos. 30 and 34 respectively, amounts together with interest have beenrefunded in full.It is stated that in the other writ petitions though amountshave been refunded but interest has not been fully granted. In view of the submissions made, W.P.(C) Nos.882/2016 and1009/2016are disposedoffas infructuoussincethe claimhas beensatisfied.As regards the other proceedings,it is open to the petitionerstorepresentafreshto the respondentswith respectto any survivinggrievance,in regard to the non-payment of part of the interest.The concernedAssessment Officer shall consider and a order on such pass speakingrepresentations/claimswithinsixweeksofreceiptthereof. W,.P.(C) Nos.879/2016, 883/2016, 885/2016, 1008/2016 and,1010/2016are accordinglydisposedoff in the aboveterms. Lj^4S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J. FEBRUARY 07, 2017sb' NAJMIWAZIRI,J. L