Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/8827/2015 Of M/S.society For Rural...

Wp(C)/8827/2015 Of M/S.society For Rural Improvement v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Palakkad

High Court 19 Mar 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/8827/2015 Of M/S.society For Rural Improvement v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Palakkad
Date of order
19 Mar 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/8827/2015 Of M/S.society For Rural Improvement v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Palakkad, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/28TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 8827 of 2015 (C) --------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------------- M/S. SOCIETY FOR RURAL IMPROVEMENT, SREE SRIMOORTHY NAGAR, NEAR CHINMAYA MISSION, KOLLENGODE, PALAKKAD, PIN-678 506, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SHRI DR.PRABHAKARAN BY SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN.SENIOR ADVOCATE ADVS. SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN SMT.DIVYA RAVINDRAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, PALAKKAD, PIN-678 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-V, 7TH FLOOR, KERA BHAVAN, SRV H.S ROAD, COCHIN-682 011 COCHIN-682 011 3. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) AYYAKKAR BHAVAN, S.T NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 001 THRISSUR-680 001 R1 TO R3 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:-TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DTD 28/11/2013 P2:-TRUE COPY OF THE APPELLATE ORDER IN ITA NO.100/PGT/CIT(A)-V/2013-14 DTD 21/2/2014DTD 21/2/2014 P3:-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER GIVING EFFECT TO THE ORDER EXT P2 P4:-TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DTD 1/7/2014 P5:-TRUE COPY OF RECTIFICATION APPLICATION DTD 1/7/2014 P6:-TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DTD 9/3/2015 P7:-TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION DTD 13/3/2015 WITHOUT ANNEXURE RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.8827 OF 2015 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 19[th] day of March, 2015 J U D G M E N T Against Ext.P3 order passed under the Income Tax Act, thepetitioner preferred Ext.P4 appeal and P7 stay petition before the2[nd] respondent. The apprehension of the petitioner is that recoverysteps, for recovery of the amounts confirmed against the petitionerby Ext.P3 order, will be proceeded with, pending disposal of thestay petition by the 2[nd] respondent. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearned Standing counsel for the respondents. 3. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of thecase as also the submissions made across the Bar, I dispose thewrit petition with the following directions: i. The 2[nd] respondent shall consider and passorders on Ext.P7 stay petition within a period oftwo months from the date of receipt of a copyof this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. ii. Recovery steps for recovery of amountsconfirmed against the petitioner by Ext.P3order shall be kept in abeyance till orders are mns passed by the 2[nd] respondent as directed aboveand communicated to the petitioner. iii. The order to be passed by the 2[nd]respondent shall be a reasoned one advertingto the contentions of the petitioner regardingexistence of a prima facie case for a stay ofrecovery pending disposal of the appeal. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE W.P.(C).NO.8827 OF 2015
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan