Wp(C)/8844/2014 Of Charter Bpo Solutions Pvt.ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Kochi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2014/6TH CHAITHRA, 1936 WP(C).No. 8844 of 2014 (E) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- M/S.CHARTER B.P.O SOLUTIONS PVT.LTD., 4TH FLOOR, S.D.F BUILDING, KUSUMAGIRI, KAKKANAD, KOCHI-682 030, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR. BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL .D. NAIR, SRI.R.SREEJITH, SMT.C.S.SULEKHA BEEVI, SMT.ROSIE ATHULYA JOSEPH. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), KOCHI – 682 018. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-II, COCHIN, ERNAKULAM – 682 018. COCHIN, ERNAKULAM – 682 018. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-03-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Prv. W.P.(C).NO.8844/2014-E: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 : COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DTD.30.1.2014 FOR THE YEAR 2011-12 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P2 : COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.2ND RESPONDENT. P3 : COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.8844 of 2014 (E) ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 27[th] day of March, 2014 JUDGMENT Against Ext.P1 assessment order passed by the first respondent, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appealalong with Ext.P3 interlocutory application for stay,which are pending consideration before the secondrespondent. 2.The grievance of the petitioner is that, it is without anyregard to the pendency of the proceedings as above,that the respondents are proceeding with the coercivesteps, which hence is sought to be intercepted by thisCourt. 3.Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances, the second W.P.(C) NO.8844 of 2014 (E) respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 petition for stay, in accordance withlaw, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 'onemonth' from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment. The coercive proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1,shall be kept in abeyance till such time. 5.Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment alongwith copy of the writ petition before the secondrespondent for further steps.with copy of the writ petition before the secondrespondent for further steps. The writ petition is disposed of as above. AMV/28/3/ Sd/- P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE