Wp(C)/9215/2014 Of Eurotech Maritime Academy v. Addl.commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Kochi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2014/7TH CHAITHRA, 1936 WP(C).No. 9215 of 2014 (B) --------------------------- PETITIONER : -------------------------- EUROTECH MARITIME ACADEMY, XXXVIII/3492, VAKILS BUILDING,OPP.TVS KALOOR, KOCHI-682 017, REP. BY FINANCE CONTROLLER,SREEKUMAR.E. BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIR SRI.R.SREEJITH SMT.C.S.SULEKHA BEEVI SMT.ROSIE ATHULYA JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), KOCHI-682 018 KOCHI-682 018 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-II, COCHIN, ERNAKULAM,PIN-682 018 COCHIN, ERNAKULAM,PIN-682 018 R1 & R2 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-03-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.9215/2014 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 26/09/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENTASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT P2COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 26/09/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENTASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT P3COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 26/09/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENTASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT P4COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE A.Y 2010-2011RESPONDENT FOR THE A.Y 2010-2011 P5COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE A.Y. 2011-2012RESPONDENT FOR THE A.Y. 2011-2012 P6COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE A.Y 2012-2013RESPONDENT FOR THE A.Y 2012-2013 P7COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE A.Y 2010-2011FOR THE A.Y 2010-2011 P8COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE A.Y 2011-2012FOR THE A.Y 2011-2012 P9COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE A.Y. 2012-2013FOR THE A.Y. 2012-2013 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ======================== W.P.(C). No. 9215 of 2014 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28[th] day of March, 2014 JUDGMENT Being aggrieved of Exts.P1 to P3 assessment orders passed bythe first respondent, the petitioner has preferred Exts.P4 to P6appeals, along with Exts.P7 to P9 petitions for stay, which are pendingconsideration before the second respondent. The grievance of thepetitioner is that, without any regard to the pendency of the aboveproceedings, the respondents are proceeding with coercive steps,which hence is sought to be intercepted by this Court. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the secondrespondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders onExts.P7 to P9 petitions for stay, in accordance with law, asexpeditiously as possible, at any rate, within 'one month' from the dateof receipt of a copy of this judgment. Coercive proceedings , if any,shall be kept in abeyance till such time. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with acopy of this writ petition before the concerned respondent for furthersteps. The writ petition is disposed of as above. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.