Wp(C) v. The Income Tax Officer (Tds)
High Court
08 Apr 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C) v. The Income Tax Officer (Tds)
Date of order
08 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C) v. The Income Tax Officer (Tds), the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: 4.In the light of the facts and circumstances of the instantcase, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:- The 2[nd] respondent is directed to decide the stay petition atExt.P7 filed in the statutory appeal at Ext.P5 by the petitioner, after following the due process of law w...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR
THURSDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1943
WP(C).No.9228 OF 2021(C)
PETITIONER/S:
THE DISTRICT LOTTERY OFFICERC. BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, CIVIL STATION (P.O), KOZHIKODE 673 020
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)
IIIRD FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE 673 001
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) , AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA KOZHIKODE 673 001
SRI. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, STANDING COUNSEL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON08.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 8th day of April 2021
Heard both sides.
2.Learned Government Pleader appearing for the petitioner
submits that the orders under section 201(1) and 201(1A) of theIncome Tax Act 1961, determining the tax liability are challenged bythe petitioner by filing statutory appeal (Ext.P5) accompanied by theStay petition at Ext.P7. However, during pendency of the appeal aswell as stay petition, the respondents have issued a letter at Ext.P6intimating initiation of coercive steps for recovery of the amount dueunder the order at Ext.P4. Hence, according to the learnedGovernment Pleader, till disposal of the appeal, the proceedings forrecovery of the amount needs to be stayed.
3.Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondentssubmits that as the said petition is pending before the 2[nd]respondent, the petition can be disposed of with a direction to the2[nd] respondent to dispose of the stay petition expeditiously.
4.In the light of the facts and circumstances of the instantcase, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:-
The 2[nd] respondent is directed to decide the stay petition atExt.P7 filed in the statutory appeal at Ext.P5 by the petitioner, after
following the due process of law within a period of two months fromthe date of communication of this judgment. The petitioner tocooperate with the 2[nd] respondent in disposal of the stay petitionexpeditiously. Till disposal of the stay petition at Ext.P7,proceedings for recovery initiated in pursuant to the Ext.P4assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. The petitioner tofurnish copy of this judgment to the concerned respondent forcompliance.
ajt
SD/-
A.M.BADAR
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER
NO.ITO(TDS)/CLT/CHND00034G/194B/2017-18
EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY TO EXHIBIT P1 BEFORETHE FIRST RESPONDENTTHE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P3A TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE NO.TDS/CLT/LOTTERY/194B/2018-19NO.TDS/CLT/LOTTERY/194B/2018-19
EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS TDS/CLT/DLO-CLT/201(1) & (IA)/FY 2016-17/2018-19CLT/201(1) & (IA)/FY 2016-17/2018-19
EXHIBIT P5TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL FILEDBEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2016-2017BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2016-2017
EXHIBIT P6TRUE COPY OF LETTER RECEIVED ON 04.03.2021 FROM INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, TDS RANGE, KOZHIKKODE DIRECTING TO PAY THE DISPUTED AMOUNT WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAYFROM INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, TDS RANGE, KOZHIKKODE DIRECTING TO PAY THE DISPUTED AMOUNT WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY
EXHIBIT P7A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION ALONG WITHA COVERING LETTERA COVERING LETTER
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.