Wp(C)/9241/2014 Of Kairali Steels And Alloys Pvt.ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
21 May 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/9241/2014 Of Kairali Steels And Alloys Pvt.ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
21 May 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp(C)/9241/2014 Of Kairali Steels And Alloys Pvt.ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Recording thesubmission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2014/31ST VAISAKHA, 1936
WP(C).No. 9241 of 2014 (E)
---------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
----------------------
KAIRALI STEELS AND ALLOYS PVT.LTD. 34/1864, MAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR - K. NOOR MOHAMMED NOORISHA
BY ADVS.SRI.V.V.ASOKAN (SR.) SRI.R.JAIKRISHNA SRI.ARUN KUMAR.P
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CIRCLE 1 (2) OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BANERJI ROAD, ERNAKULAM - 682 018. OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BANERJI ROAD, ERNAKULAM - 682 018.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1 (2) OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, I.S. PRESS ROAD BANERJI ROAD, ERNAKULAM - 682 018. CIRCLE 1 (2) OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, I.S. PRESS ROAD BANERJI ROAD, ERNAKULAM - 682 018.
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21-05-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
=====================
W.P.(C) No. 9241 of 2014======================Dated this the 21[st] day of May, 2014
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that theWrit Petition has become infructuous. Recording thesubmission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
K. VINOD CHANDRAN,JUDGE
SB
// TRUE COPY //
P.A TO JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.