Wp(C)/9411/2022 Of Aster Dm Healthcare Ltd v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax – Kochi I
High Court
01 Apr 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/9411/2022 Of Aster Dm Healthcare Ltd v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax – Kochi I
Date of order
01 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/9411/2022 Of Aster Dm Healthcare Ltd v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax – Kochi I, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMASFRIDAY, THE 1 DAY OF APRIL 2022 / 11TH CHAITHRA, 1944
PETITIONER:
WP(C) NO. 9411 OF 2022
ASTER DM HEALTHCARE LTD.,KUTTISAHIB ROAD, ASTER MEDCITY HOSPITAL, CHERANELLORE, KOCHI – 682027, REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (CORPORATE FINANCE), SOORAJ P., AGED 45 YEARS, SONOF BALAKRISHNAN, RESIDING AT SWASTHIK, LANE-21, TOCH SCHOOL ROAD, VYTILLA, KOCHI - 682 019.
BY ADVS.
B.ASHOK SHENOYP.S.GIREESHARJUN R NAIK
RESPONDENTS:
1THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX –KOCHI I,CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDINGS, IS PRESS ROAD, KOCHI, PIN – 682018CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDINGS, IS PRESS ROAD, KOCHI, PIN – 682018
2THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CORPORATE CIR 1(1)CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDINGS, IS PRESS ROAD, KOCHI, PIN - 682018
BY ADV.JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSIONON 01.04.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.===========================WP(C) No. 9411 OF 2022============================Dated this the 1[st] day of April, 2022
JUDGMENT
The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted thatpursuant to Ext.P7 notice, an objection was preferred by thepetitioner and an order of assessment has also been issued.
In view of the above, reserving the liberty of the petitioner topursue the statutory remedies available against the saidassessment order, this writ petition is closed.
nk
Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9411/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2018-19/1014661716(1)DATED 30.12.2018 ISSUED BY 2 RESPONDENT INRESPECT OF PETITIONER FOR THE ASSESSMENTYEAR 2016-17 ALONG WITH INCOME TAXCOMPUTATION FORM ATTACHED THEREWITHITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2018-19/1014661716(1)DATED 30.12.2018 ISSUED BY 2 RESPONDENT INRESPECT OF PETITIONER FOR THE ASSESSMENTYEAR 2016-17 ALONG WITH INCOME TAXCOMPUTATION FORM ATTACHED THEREWITH
Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF APPEAL DATED NIL FILED BYPETITIONER BEFORE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX (APPEALS) THROUGH NATIONAL FACELESSAPPEAL CENTREPETITIONER BEFORE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX (APPEALS) THROUGH NATIONAL FACELESSAPPEAL CENTREExhibit P3TRUECOPYOFNOTICENO.PCIT-2/CHN/R/263/21/2020-21DATED04.02.2021 ISSUED BY 1 RESPONDENT TOPETITIONER NO.PCIT-2/CHN/R/263/21/2020-21DATED04.02.2021 ISSUED BY 1 RESPONDENT TOPETITIONER Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 16.02.2021SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE 1 RESPONDENTSUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE 1 RESPONDENT
Exhibit P5TRUE COPY OF ORDER UNDER SECTION 263 OFINCOME TAX ACT 1961, DATED 09.03.2021PASSED BY THE 1 RESPONDENT IN RESPECT OFPETITIONER FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17INCOME TAX ACT 1961, DATED 09.03.2021PASSED BY THE 1 RESPONDENT IN RESPECT OFPETITIONER FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17Exhibit P6TRUE COPY OF APPEAL DATED 20.07.2021 FILEDBY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE INCOME TAXAPPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH, NUMBEREDAS ITA 98/COCH/2021BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE INCOME TAXAPPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH, NUMBEREDAS ITA 98/COCH/2021Exhibit P7TRUE COPY OF NOTICE NO.ITBA/AST/F/142(1)2021-22/1040408283(1), UNDER SECTION 142(1)OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 DATED 07.03.2022ISSUED BY 2 RESPONDENT TO PETITIONER 2021-22/1040408283(1), UNDER SECTION 142(1)OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 DATED 07.03.2022ISSUED BY 2 RESPONDENT TO PETITIONER
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.