Wp(C)/9520/2019 Of Universal Gospel Ministries v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
28 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/9520/2019 Of Universal Gospel Ministries v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
28 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/9520/2019 Of Universal Gospel Ministries v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: Having regard to the circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 stay petition as expeditiously as possible,preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis judgment.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
THURSDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1941WP(C).No. 9520 of 2019
PETITIONER/S:
UNIVERSAL GOSPEL MINISTRIESCARMEL ARA-52, KULUMALA, PULIYARAKONAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 573, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE SEBASTIAN MATHEW.
BY ADVS.SRI.S.ARUN RAJSMT.C.T.SUJA
RESPONDENT/S:
1INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD -1 (3) FIRST FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, 1ST FLOOR, KAWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 003.
2COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX APPEALS, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KAWDIAR P.O., TRIVANDRUM 695 003.3THE MANAGER,STATE BANK OF INDIA, PEROORKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 005.
SRI. C.K.GOVINDAN, SR.GPSC SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAMSRI.A.KUMAR-SBI
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri.Arun Raj, the learned counsel for the petitioner,
Sri.A.Kumar, the learned Standing Counsel for SBI andSri.C.K.Govindan, the learned Senior Government Pleader.
2. The petitioner prays for a direction to the secondrespondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 stay petitionexpeditiously.
3. Having regard to the circumstances of the case, the writ
petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider
and dispose of Ext.P3 stay petition as expeditiously as possible,preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis judgment.
In the meantime the recovery proceedings are stayed fortwo months from today.
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTI
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 10.12.2018 PASSED UNDER SECTION 143 3 OF THE ACT BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2016-17 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE.
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM ALONG WITH GROUNDS OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2016-17. ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE.
EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2016-17.THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2016-17.
EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 12.3.2019 ISSUED U/S. 226 3 OF THEA CT BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT BANK.ISSUED U/S. 226 3 OF THEA CT BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT BANK.
RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL
//TRUE COPY// Sd/- PA TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.