Wp(C) v. The Income Tax Officer (Tds)
High Court
27 Apr 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C) v. The Income Tax Officer (Tds)
Date of order
27 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C) v. The Income Tax Officer (Tds), the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 7TH VAISAKHA, 1943WP(C).No.9774 OF 2021(V)
PETITIONER:
THE DISTRICT LOTTERY OFFICERC.BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, CIVIL STATION (P.O.), KOZHIKODE - 673 020.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.PRIYA SHANAVAS
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)IIIRD FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.IIIRD FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE - 673001.AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE - 673001.
BY ADV.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON27.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 27[th] day of April, 2021
Ext.P7 is a stay petition filed by the writ petitioner before the 2[nd]respondent.
2. The issue relates to a penalty for omission to deduct TDS forthe payments made towards lottery winnings. The 1[st] respondentimposed a penalty of Rs.26,190/- upon the writ petitioner. Ext.P5 appealalong with Ext.P7 stay petition was filed in 2019, and the same ispending consideration. According to the petitioner, there are validcontentions raised by them in the appeal.
3. In view of the pendency of Ext.P5 appeal, I direct the 2[nd]respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P7 staypetition, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of threemonths from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. All coercivesteps, pursuant to Ext.P4, shall be kept in abeyance till a decision istaken on Ext.P7 stay petition.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
Bechu Kurian Thomas
Judge
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.ITO(TDS)/ CLT/CHND00034G/194B/2017-18.
EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY TO EXHIBIT P1 BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3A TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE NO.TDS/CLT/LOTTERY/194B/2018-19.
EXHIBIT P4A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS TDS/CLT/DLO-CLT/201(1)&(IA)/FY 2012-13/2018-19.TDS/CLT/DLO-CLT/201(1)&(IA)/FY 2012-13/2018-19.
EXHIBIT P5TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THEFINANCIAL YEAR 2012-2013.FILED BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THEFINANCIAL YEAR 2012-2013.
EXHIBIT P6TRUE COPY OF LETTER RECEIVED ON 04/03/2021FROM INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, TDS RANGE, KOZHIKODE DIRECTING TO PAY THE DISPUTED AMOUNT WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY.FROM INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, TDS RANGE, KOZHIKODE DIRECTING TO PAY THE DISPUTED AMOUNT WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY.
EXHIBIT P7A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION ALONG WITH A COVERING LETTER.WITH A COVERING LETTER.
/TRUE COPY/
P.A. TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.