Wp(C)/9924/2019 Of Elamkulam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
01 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/9924/2019 Of Elamkulam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
01 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/9924/2019 Of Elamkulam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: The petitioner prays for a direction to the second 3.Having regard to the circumstances of the case the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent toconsider and dispose of Ext.P4 appeal as expeditiously aspossible, preferably within four weeks from today.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 11TH CHAITHRA, 1941
WP(C).No. 9924 of 2019
PETITIONER:
ELAMKULAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDNO.1878, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KALLUVATHUKKAL P.O,KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 578.
BY ADVS.T R HARIKUMARSRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN
RESPONDENTS:
SC SRI. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM., SRI O.P. JOSE WINSON
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.04.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 9924 of 2019
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri. T.R Harikumar, the learned counsel for thepetitioner and Sri. O.P Jos Winson appeared on behalf of thelearned Standing Counsel.
2.The petitioner prays for a direction to the secondrespondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P4 appealexpeditiously.
The petitioner prays for a direction to the second
3.Having regard to the circumstances of the case the
writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent toconsider and dispose of Ext.P4 appeal as expeditiously aspossible, preferably within four weeks from today.
Recovery proceedings pursuant to the orders under appealbefore the second respondent are stayed for four weeks fromtoday.
JS
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTIJUDGE
WP(C).No. 9924 of 2019
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 07.01.2016 ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(GENERAL) KOLLAM.07.01.2016 ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(GENERAL) KOLLAM.
EXHIBIT P2A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FORTHE YEAR 2013-2014 DATED 22.03.2016.THE YEAR 2013-2014 DATED 22.03.2016.
EXHIBIT P3A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE1ST RESPONDENT DATED 22.03.2016.1ST RESPONDENT DATED 22.03.2016.
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT, AGAINST EXT P2 ASSESSMENT ORDER ALONG WITH COVERING LETTER DATED 08.04.2016.THE 2ND RESPONDENT, AGAINST EXT P2 ASSESSMENT ORDER ALONG WITH COVERING LETTER DATED 08.04.2016.
EXHIBIT P5
A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 13.04.2016.BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 13.04.2016.
EXHIBIT P6A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 10.01.2019 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.10.01.2019 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P7A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.02.2019 IN WPC NO.5070 OF 2019.21.02.2019 IN WPC NO.5070 OF 2019.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.