Wp(C)/9924/2020 Of Thayyil Antony Sajan v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
15 May 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/9924/2020 Of Thayyil Antony Sajan v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
15 May 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/9924/2020 Of Thayyil Antony Sajan v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: This Writ Petition stands disposed of asabove.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT9916
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE GOPINATH.P.
FRIDAY, THE 15 DAY OF MAY, 2020/25 VAISAKHA, 1942
W.P(C) NO.9924 OF 2020
PETITIONER
THAYYIL ANTONY SAJANS/O ANTONY, HOUSE NO.XII-188 BKOOVAPADAM, MATTANCHERRY,ERNAKULAM – 682002.
BY ADVOCATE SRI. A. KRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS
1.INCOME TAX OFFICERNON CORP. WARD NO. 2 (5),OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICERL. G. TOWERS, P. T. JACOB ROAD, THOPPUMPADY, ERNAKULAM,KOCHI – 682005.
2.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,(APPEALS), KOCHI – 2, OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX (APPEALS), G- 51, PARAPPILLY LANE, GIRI NAGAR,MANORAMA JUNCTION, ERNAKULAM – 682036.
R1-2 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.JOSE JOSEPH
THIS WRIT PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.05.2020,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Dated this the 15th day of May, 2020
JUDGMENT
The petitioner suffered an order of assessmentu/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act. He has filedExt.P2 appeal against Ext.P1 assessment order andhas also deposited an amount of Rs.1,29,574/-against the impugned demand. Petitioner statesthat he has filed Ext.P4 application before theincome tax officer seeking a stay of recovery offurther amounts pending disposal of the appeal. Ona consideration of the matter, I am of the opinionthat Ext.P4 application can be considered to be anapplication u/s.220(6) of the Income Tax Act.
2.I have heard the learned counsel for thepetitioner and Sri.Jose Joseph learned StandingCounsel appearing for the Income Tax Department.
3.There will be a direction to the firstrespondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4application treating the same to be an application
W.P(C) NO.9924 OF 2020 3
u/s.220(6) of the Income Tax Act within a periodof one month from the date of receipt of copy ofthis judgment. Till such time as orders are passedon Ext.P4, further recovery pursuant to Ext.P1order of assessment shall be kept in abeyance. This Writ Petition stands disposed of asabove.
(Sd/-)
GOPINATH.P, JUDGE
pm
W.P(C) NO.9924 OF 2020 4
PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS:
APPENDIX.
EXT. P1 – TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY 1 RESPONDENT, DATED 26.12.2019.
EXT. P1 (A) – TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DT. 26.12.’19
EXT. P2 – TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL 21.01.2020 FILED BEFORE 2 RESPONDENT.
EXT. P3 – TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN FOR REMITTANCE OF RS. 1,29,574/- DATED 25.02.2020.
EXT. P4 – TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 28.01.2020.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.