Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/9989/2009 Of Thiruvananthapuram De...

Wp(C)/9989/2009 Of Thiruvananthapuram Development Authority v. Income Tax Officer Ward (2)4

High Court 27 Mar 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/9989/2009 Of Thiruvananthapuram Development Authority v. Income Tax Officer Ward (2)4
Date of order
27 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/9989/2009 Of Thiruvananthapuram Development Authority v. Income Tax Officer Ward (2)4, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Decision: Writ petition is disposed of directing the 2[nd] respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P3 within two weeks from thedate of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2009 / 6TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 9989 of 2009(P) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (TRIDA), JAYA MANSION, VAZHUTHACAD, SASTHAMANGALAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-10 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAMESH BABU SRI.D.KRISHNA PRASAD RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -2 (4), KOWDIAR, TRIVANDRUM. 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), KOWDIAR, TRIVANDRUM. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M. JOSEPH, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 9989 OF 2009 P ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 27[th] day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T Feeling aggrieved by Ext.P1, petitioner has preferredExt.P2 appeal accompanied by Ext.P3 stay petition. 2.I heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learnedstanding counsel. Writ petition is disposed of directing the 2[nd] respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P3 within two weeks from thedate of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such a decision istaken, proceedings pursuant to Exts.P4 and P5 will be kept inabeyance. aks Sd/-(K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan