Wp(C)/9989/2009 Of Thiruvananthapuram Development Authority v. Income Tax Officer Ward (2)4
High Court
27 Mar 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/9989/2009 Of Thiruvananthapuram Development Authority v. Income Tax Officer Ward (2)4
Date of order
27 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/9989/2009 Of Thiruvananthapuram Development Authority v. Income Tax Officer Ward (2)4, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Writ petition is disposed of directing the 2[nd] respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P3 within two weeks from thedate of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH
FRIDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2009 / 6TH CHAITHRA 1931
WP(C).No. 9989 of 2009(P)
-------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
---------------
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (TRIDA), JAYA MANSION, VAZHUTHACAD,
SASTHAMANGALAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-10
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADV. SRI.S.RAMESH BABU
SRI.D.KRISHNA PRASAD
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
1. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -2 (4),
KOWDIAR, TRIVANDRUM.
2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),
KOWDIAR, TRIVANDRUM.
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 27/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
K.M. JOSEPH, J.
````````````````````````````````````````````````````
W.P.(C) No. 9989 OF 2009 P
````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Dated this the 27[th] day of March, 2009
J U D G M E N T
Feeling aggrieved by Ext.P1, petitioner has preferredExt.P2 appeal accompanied by Ext.P3 stay petition.
2.I heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learnedstanding counsel.
Writ petition is disposed of directing the 2[nd] respondent to
consider and take a decision on Ext.P3 within two weeks from thedate of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such a decision istaken, proceedings pursuant to Exts.P4 and P5 will be kept inabeyance.
aks
Sd/-(K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE)
// TRUE COPY //
P.A. TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.