Wp(C) v. Operative Bank Ltd, The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
26 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C) v. Operative Bank Ltd, The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
26 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C) v. Operative Bank Ltd, The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.5531 OF 2020(N)
PETITIONER/S:
CHATHANNOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.2544,CHATHANNOOR P. O., KOLLAM - 691 572, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY G. RAJENDRA PRASAD.
BY ADVS.DR.K.P.PRADEEPSMT.T.THASMI
RESPONDENT/S:
BY SC SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON26.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 26th day of February 2020
Heard Sri. K.P.Pradeep, the learned counsel for the
petitioner and Sri. Christopher Abraham, the learnedStanding Counsel for respondents.
2.
Petitioner refers to and relies on judgment
dated 01.07.2019 in W.A No.1536 of 2019 and connected
cases to contend that the Division Bench directeddisposal of appeal and granted stay of recoveryproceedings during the pendency of the appeal.
3.
The learned Standing Counsel admits that the
facts of the case are substantially same and similar to thefacts noted by the Division Bench in W.A. No.1536 of2019, hence can be followed.
Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing the
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/ 3[rd] respondentto consider and dispose of the statutory appeal filed bythe petitioner herein at the earliest taking note of theFull Bench decision reported in The Mavilayi Service Co-
v. operative Bank Ltd, The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Calicut[2019 (2) KHC 287] and to keep in abeyancerecovery proceedings and collection of tax assessed,pending disposal of such appeal.
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTI
JUDGE
uu
27.02.2020
WP(C).No.5531 OF 2020 4
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1020773203(1) DATED 20.11.2019 ISSUED FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 12.12.2019 FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18.
EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE NO.ITBA/AST/S/156/2019-20/1020773401(1) DATED 20.11.2019 FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 ISSUED BY THE
EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION FILED ON 20.2.2020 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT IN EXT. P2 APPEAL.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.